skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
Links
- albatross! (dirk gently)
- attaturk
- billmon
- blastoff!
- bouphonia (phila)
- cannablog (whig)
- chris floyd
- coeruleus (sir oolius)
- dependable renegade (watertiger)
- dharmabums
- digby
- dohiyimir
- driftglass (this guy is funny)
- echidneofthesnakes
- firedoglake (jane, christy, some other people)
- first draft (athenae, holden, tena, scout)
- guano island (syd barret, he's dead)
- hecate
- informed comment
- jesus' general
- majikthise
- mariamariacuchita
- mia culpa (desi/assorted)
- michelle malkin is an idiot
- multi medium (eli)
- no capital
- olvzl
- once upon a time (read this blog)
- online blogintegrity (that's silly)
- plush life (fourlegs good)
- power pop
- prickstein wisdom (ntodd, posing as a paste eater)
- rants from the rookery (ellroon)
- riverbend
- RJM
- rudepundit
- spork in the drawer (spork)
- steve gilliard
- talking points memo (josh marshall)
- thepoliticalcat
- walled in pond (woody)
- whiskey fire (thers)
- zen cabin (ripley)
1 comment:
I hope you don't mind an off-topic comment, but I think this is important: There is a great post on The Carpetbagger Report from a few days ago about the mainstream media's (specifically Time magazine's) ignoring the prosecutor purge scandal.
What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?
It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.
Post a Comment